Jan 102010

Since I started selling lighting systems in 1991, I’ve been interested in light: quantity, quality, and efficiency. Of these three quality is the hardest to quantitize. We have been stuck with the Color Rendering Index (CRI) since 1964 when the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) came up with the idea of comparing each lamp to an ideal source. What many didn’t realize is this idealized source isn’t the same for every lamp. This makes CRI readings of limited use. Jeff Robins writing for Architectural Lighting (January 2010) reports on a new standard being developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The NIST is trying to overcome the limitation of 14 pigment samples and the way the human sees light- it varies with the illumination level and color temperature.

Since 2006, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been developing a new metric, the color quality scale (CQS), that determines color performance using a method different from the CRI. When completed, the NIST will propose it as the new international standard. A different color space is used, and a new set of 15 reflective color samples, highly saturated and taken from the Munsell color system, replaces the 14 CRI samples and defines the difference between the test lamp and its reference. The NIST claims this should overcome hue and saturation shifts left out of the CRI calculation. This penalizes lamps of extreme CCTs, which frequently exhibit poor color quality. In the end, what will be familiar to users of the CRI is the CQS span, which will range from zero to 100. – (The Color Rendering Debate)

Side note:
This article also talks about the history of lighting as it relates to the CIE and the development of the CRI standard.

The CIE did not, however, solve the problem of color rendering. At the time, the issue was a small one. Remember, this was 1931; the lighting industry was dominated by the incandescent lamp, and color rendering had not yet been identified as an issue. The first lamp source other than incandescent, the mercury vapor lamp, was not available commercially until 1933. Fluorescent (1) and sodium discharge lamps(2) wouldn’t follow until later that decade, and metal halide wouldn’t come along until the late 1950s.

From the 1930s to the early 1960s, lamp quality improved significantly, especially in products that featured fluorescents, which, because of their lumen efficiency and reduced energy needs, became the lamp of choice for most commercial interior applications. The retail market was particularly keen to use the most energy-efficient means to light its products in an attractive manner.

  1. Albert W. Hull of GE’s Schenectady Research Laboratory filed for a patent on this invention in 1927, which was issued in 1931.Sales of “fluorescent lumiline lamps” commenced in 1938. By 1951 more light was produced in the United States by fluorescent lamps than by incandescent lamps. -excerpts from Wikipedia
  2. General Electric’s History of Light: Timeline

125 Years of General Electric Lighting

1879-First Incandescent Lamp
1913-First Energy Saving Lamp
1934-Mercury Vapor Lamp
1938-First Practical Fluorescent Lamp
1944-Slimline Fluorescent Lamp
1952-Rapid Start Fluorescent Lamp & Circuit
1954-High Output Fluorescent Lamp
1955-Quartz Arc Tube for Mercury Lamp
1959-Quartz Halogen Lamp
1961-High Pressure Sodium Lamp
1962-Metal Halide
1966-White Mercury Vapor Lamp
1974-Watt-Miser® Fluorescent
1975-MR16 Lamp
1983-Linear Halogen HIRTM Lamp
1985-Low Watt Biax® Compact Fluorescent Lamp
1989-Halogen PAR Lamp
1994-Induction Fluorescent Lamp
1995-Watt-Miser® Metal Halide Lamp
1996-CFL Amalgam Technology
1998-Halogen IR
2000-T8 Watt-Miser® Fluorescent Lamp
2000-Halogen IR 24volt Family
2000-StayBright® Watt Miser® Metal Halide Lamp
2001-T8 SXL
2001-57w &70w CFL Plug-in
2002-Tetra LED System
This is an abbreviated list where I selected important historic milestones rather than marketing milestones from GE’s Tree of Light. (PDF)

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/public/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4609